Construction: Shaping New Law into Solution-Focused Advice for Your Clients

Wed 27 June 2018

The Caledonian Club 9 Halkin Street London SW1X 7DR

Answers to 13 Thorny Questions: Directly from 5 QCs and 2 Solicitors of Outstanding Ability

5 hrs CPD

This conference is now fully booked.

Next available date:
Thu 12 July 2018

New Date

Add your name and email address to be notified when a place becomes available on Wed 27 June 2018

Waiting List


  1. Registration and coffee

  2. Introduction

    Construction: Shaping new law into solution-focused advice for your clients

    Chaired by: Keith Bishop of Muckle LLP

    Keith has "a vast amount of practical knowledge and experience, and a great strategic eye." He has acted as an adjudicator in multiple major construction disputes (including PFI projects).

  3. Adjudication

    What are the options for a "smash and grab" adjudication following the Grove Developments v S&T litigation for those (1) claiming money and (2) defending against it?

    Answered by: Dominique Rawley QC

    Dominique is one of the UK's most skilled and tactically astute construction law practitioners. She is co-author of the "Construction Adjudication & Payments Handbook."

  4. Concurrent delay

    Drawing on the North Midland Building case, why do you need to amend concurrent delay allocation clauses in the standard forms?

    Or is it simply a matter for litigators?

    Answered by: Marion Smith QC

    Marion "continues to impress with her stellar construction practice." She has a knack for conveying complex law to commercial people. She brings a huge number of cases to the table.

  5. Morning coffee

  6. MT Hojgaard decision

    Concentrating on the standard forms, when do "fitness for purpose" obligations vitiate "reasonable care and skill" obligations and vice versa?

    Is there a solution?

    Answered by: Roger Stewart QC

    Roger is "an example of sheer brilliance" and is able to “articulate the most complex concepts with simplicity and brevity.” He is a Professional Negligence Silk of the Year.

  7. Performance bonds

    In light of the Carillion collapse, are on-demand performance bonds worthwhile?

    What other forms of performance security should clients consider?

    Answered by: David Sears QC

    David is "absolutely brilliant, a great advocate and a tenacious fighter." He contributed "Delay and Disruption, Damages and Penalties" to Hudson’s Building and Engineering Contracts.

  8. Over-run

  9. Lunch

  10. Assignation

    Using real-life examples, how can you assign the benefits of construction contract, so as to avoid the wrangling evident in the Mailbox v Galliford Try litigation?

    Answered by: Paul Darling OBE QC

    Paul is "a larger than life personality and a massive presence in court." "When you have a tricky case, you go to him.” He is a Construction Silk of the Year (with more than 60 reported cases).

  11. Standard forms

    How has design liability changed under NEC4 and Fidic 2017?

    Answered by: Max Wieliczko of HFW

    Max is co-author of "Construction Contract Variations." He knows the law inside out and is acting in the litigation over the collapse of a 6km tunnel at the Glendoe hydro-electric scheme.

  12. Over-run

  13. Close of conference