Registration and coffee
Awarding Public Contracts Skilfully and Lawfully within the Procurement Rules
Thu 21 June 2018
The Caledonian Club 9 Halkin Street London SW1X 7DR
Answers to 21 Thorny Questions: Directly from 7 of the UK's Most Sought-After Lawyers and 3 Industry Experts
5 hrs CPD
This conference is now over
Awarding public contracts skilfully and lawfully within the procurement rules
Chaired by: Edward Quigg of Quigg Golden
Edward is one of the UK's most-experienced public procurement experts. He is a veteran of scores of challenges. He is a guest lecturer at Queens University and the Treasurer of the Adjudication Society.
Anne Hardy of The National Archives. Previously Head of Procurement, Border Force and Immigration Enforcement at the Home Office
David Hansom, Head of Procurement, Clyde & Co
Anne and David will be taking questions and inspiring practical solutions throughout the day.
Using real-life examples, when do review clauses crack the problem of varying a contract as business needs change?
How flexible can they be; how do you get the best out of them; what will be approved by the courts?
Answered by: Kate Rees of Hogan Lovells
Kate is one of the "World's Top 10 Procurement Lawyers." She advised BAA on the competition for a prime supplier of IT services and the Met Police on the outsourcing of all non-core support functions.
What is considered to be a "serious breach," in the context of damages as a remedy being available only when there is a “serious breach” of the procurement regulations?
Answered by: Fionnuala McCredie QC of Keating Chambers
Fionnuala is "incredibly impressive" and "held in the highest esteem for her procurement practice." "Those that know her will not even consider using anyone else for tricky cases."
How do you assess competence and capability without favouring known-suppliers with experience of the contract type?
Can bidders with sketchy experience refer to projects they carried out for other companies?
Answered by: Michael Mousdale of Browne Jacobson LLP
Michael has been involved in some of the most complex and innovative procurements, including the first ever PFI scheme and Europe's largest local government PFI (Greater Manchester Waste Project.)
When facing up to FOI requests, what are the unwritten conventions on what records to release and what to withhold (at different tender stages)?
Is it sensible to keep more or fewer records (such as taped meetings for example)?
Answered by: Eleanor Grey QC of 39 Essex Chambers
Eleanor is "superb - just brilliant - hugely experienced in handling information law for public and regulatory bodies." She serves on the Attorney General's FOIA panel and sits as a Tribunal judge.
When can you lawfully strike out a bid from an incumbent (or other bidder) who has not performed twice or more?
What counts as evidence and when is it sufficiently serious?
What if you "know" there is a problem (but it is personal rather than public knowledge)?
Answered by: Mark Bassett of Dentons
Mark has "exceptional knowledge and a wealth of experience." He acted for LBHF over the public procurement compliance of its plans for the regeneration of Earls Court.
What are the current practical trends and issues in the selection stage?
How is the ESPD working in practice, and how can selection be used as an innovative tool and not just a procedural step?
Answered by: David Hansom of Clyde & Co
David is involved in the regeneration of both the HMS Daedalus site in Hampshire and New Covent Garden Market. He is a "go-to lawyer because he always provides clear and practical advice."
What are the golden rules of how not to confer an advantage through early contractor involvement, i.e. (1) pre-market testing, (2) designing tender parameters, (3) specification writing?
Answered by: Emily Heard of Bevan Brittan
Emily is author of "NHS Procurement Knife Fight." She acted in the Fair Crime Contract Alliance litigation, which is described as the most complex public procurement dispute ever brought.
Close of conference