Our conferences on Judicial Review provide up-to-date solutions and practical tips on key issues, direct from sought-after experts
View all conferences
Answers to 11 Thorny Questions: Directly from 7 QCs and 1 Senior Junior of Outstanding Ability
EU law - Anneli Howard QC, Monckton Chambers
How do you run arguments formerly based on fundamental principles of EU law?
Same old/same old or important modifications to be made?
1.094 MB PDF
How does candour apply at the pre and post-permission stages?
Are its requirements more rigorous once permission has been granted?
879.069 KB PDF
What are the unresolved issues - both legal and practical - over deference to regulatory and expert panels, and what are the implications for JR?
783.927 KB PDF
Duty to consult - Sarabjit Singh QC, 1 Crown Office Row
The interaction of the duty to consult with the common law duty of fairness - how far can you push the Court? When does fairness require you to re-consult?
898.003 KB PDF
Substantive unfairness - Sarah Hannett QC, Matrix Chambers
Drawing on recent and live cases, how is the Court responding to claims of substantive unfairness in judicial review?
645.795 KB PDF
Rolling JR - James Goudie QC, 11KBW
How has existing thinking changed on "rolling" Judicial Review claims - where the Court considers the case as the claim and circumstances progress?
329.433 KB PDF
Browse all documents on Judicial Review