1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Topic
  4. Judicial Review

Conferences on Judicial Review

Our conferences on Judicial Review provide up-to-date solutions and practical tips on key issues, direct from sought-after experts

View all conferences

Judicial Review: Shaping New Law into Solution-Focused Answers for Your Clients

London

Answers to 9 Thorny Questions: Directly from 8 QCs and Senior Juniors of Outstanding Ability

Judicial Review
Past Conference Documents

pdf

Pre-action in JR - David Wolfe QC, Matrix Chambers

Pre-action in JR - David Wolfe QC, Matrix Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you guide clients through the twists and turns of the pre-action stage, including costs, ADR and candour?

Download 2.076 MB PDF

pdf

Disclosure - James McClelland, Fountain Court Chambers

Disclosure - James McClelland, Fountain Court Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you approach the practical and legal implications of variable standards of disclosure in the Administrative Court: i.e. feast or famine?

Download 841.776 KB PDF

pdf

Gallaher decision - Gerry Facenna QC, Monckton Chambers

Gallaher decision - Gerry Facenna QC, Monckton Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) In the spotlight of Gallaher, how are you to steer clients through claims for "legitimate expectation" or "conspicuous unfairness"? What leeway do you have?

Download 765.244 KB PDF

pdf

No substantial difference (notes) - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers

No substantial difference (notes) - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?

Download 442.313 KB PDF

pdf

No substantial difference - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers

No substantial difference - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.19) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?

Download 497.689 KB PDF

pdf

Remedies - Richard Clayton QC, Ely Place Chambers

Remedies - Richard Clayton QC, Ely Place Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do judges decide? When will they substitute their own decision and when will they refer it all back to the original decision maker? What are the predictors?

Download 627.607 KB PDF

Browse all documents on Judicial Review

The Past Paper Bulletin

Receive a curated selection of the most desirable past conference documents relevant to your industry, direct to your inbox. Keep abreast of key issues and points of concern.

Subscribe

The Past Paper Bulletin
Top