Site plan - James Hanham, Maitland Chambers
Yielding-up
How far can you push the line over yielding up obligations in the leases following Pullman Foods Ltd v The Welsh Ministers?
CVAs - Nicholas Trompeter, Selborne Chambers
What is the potential for landlords to challenge CVAs for abuse of process and inequitable treatment of creditors?
Restrictive covenants - Martin Hutchings QC, Wilberforce Chambers
What are the unresolved issues - legal and practical - concerning restrictive covenants and s.84(1) following the Supreme Court's decision in Alexander Devine v Housing Solutions [2020]?
Break clauses - Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC, Falcon Chambers
Where are the grey areas over break clauses, looking at (1) vacant possession, (2) reinstatement, (3) obligation to remove tenant's chattels and fixtures?
Forfeiture - Andrew Walker QC, Maitland Chambers
How will the judicial approach to forfeiture change once the temporary Coronavirus measure is lifted?
Where will the challenges come from?
Renewals - James Styles, Stephenson Harwood
Who is calling the shots when it comes to post pandemic ’54 Act lease renewals?
Are “Covid clauses” suspending rents, short term leases and break clauses the new normal?
Alienation - Christopher Heather QC, Tanfield Chambers
Going beyond Canary Wharf v European Medicines Agency, how can you gain an edge for clients in alienation cases?
How can you expect the judges to react?
What counts and what will make a difference?
Electronic Communications Code - Brie Stevens-Hoare QC, Hardwicke
Which way is the wind blowing for cases coming under the Electronic Communications Code?
Which arguments can landlords deploy to preserve the value and long-term potential of their property assets?
Redevelopment - Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC, Falcon Chambers
Cutting through all the opinions, how do you demonstrate a “genuine intention” to redevelop in the light of S Franses v The Cavendish Hotel litigation?
What will sway the court?
Redevelopment (NTS) - Guy Fetherstonhaugh QC, Falcon Chambers
Cutting through all the opinions, how do you demonstrate a “genuine intention” to redevelop in the light of S Franses v The Cavendish Hotel litigation?
What will sway the court?
