Inferences - Steven Gee QC, Monckton Chambers
How willing is the Court to accept inferences when pleading fraud, because the victim may not know any - or many - of the facts?
How strong should the case be before starting out?
Offshore trusts - Andrew Onslow QC, 3 Verulam Buildings
Mezhprom v. Pugachev: can fraudsters safely protect their assets in offshore trusts?
Which methods and techniques will flush them out?
Disclosure (NTS) - Richard Morgan QC, Maitland Chambers
Against a backdrop of recent and live cases, to what extent has the full and frank disclosure requirement morphed into a duty of fair presentation?
What can you realistically ask for or hold back?
Inferences (NTS 1) - Steven Gee QC, Monckton Chambers
How willing is the Court to accept inferences when pleading fraud, because the victim may not know any - or many - of the facts?
How strong should the case be before starting out?
Inferences (NTS 2) - Steven Gee QC, Monckton Chambers
How willing is the Court to accept inferences when pleading fraud, because the victim may not know any - or many - of the facts?
How strong should the case be before starting out?
Insolvency (NTS) - Marcia Shekerdemian QC, Wilberforce Chambers
Weighing up all the tactical scenarios, when will insolvency law powers turn the scales in your clients' favour when obtaining disclosure and investigating fraud?
Social Media - Philip Young, Cooke, Young & Keidan
How can you use social media to your advantage both as a claimant and a defendant, supported by specific examples of orders that have been made?
Contempt, damages and privilege - Jeffrey Gruder QC, Essex Court Chambers
How has Ablyazov litigation changed existing thinking on contempt, damages and privilege?
How can you expect the judges to react?
Coterminous cases - Jonathan Fisher QC, Bright Line Law
Can you coat-tail freezing actions brought by the police or make use of prosecution evidence?
Considering the different burdens of proof, how do you progress the civil case if there are acquittals?
Disclosure - Richard Morgan QC, Maitland Chambers
Against a backdrop of recent and live cases, to what extent has the full and frank disclosure requirement morphed into a duty of fair presentation?
What can you realistically ask for or hold back?
