Duty to consult (NTS) - Sarah Hannett, Matrix Chambers
How far can you push the boundaries of a public body's duty to consult (adequately), supported by case law and practical examples?
Facts are facts - James McClelland, Brick Court Chambers
Facts are facts, but not all facts are created equal - when is a fact "jurisdictional" and why does it matter?
Reasons and fairness (NTS) - Fenella Morris QC, 39 Essex Chambers
Is there a shift in the wind over the general common law duty to give full and comprehensible reasons linked to fairness?
Conspicuous unfairness - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers
How are judges weighing "conspicuous unfairness" as a factor since Gallaher?
Important new innovation or damp squib?
Disclosure (NTS) - Hugo Keith QC, 3RB
What is realistic and achievable when seeking disclosure in cases concerning public interest immunity and closed material proceedings?
Pre-action in JR - David Wolfe QC, Matrix Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you guide clients through the twists and turns of the pre-action stage, including costs, ADR and candour?
Disclosure - James McClelland, Fountain Court Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you approach the practical and legal implications of variable standards of disclosure in the Administrative Court: i.e. feast or famine?
Gallaher decision - Gerry Facenna QC, Monckton Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) In the spotlight of Gallaher, how are you to steer clients through claims for "legitimate expectation" or "conspicuous unfairness"? What leeway do you have?
No substantial difference (notes) - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?
No substantial difference - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.19) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?
