Conference documents for

Judicial Review: Shaping New Law into Solution-Focused Answers for Your Clients 2024

Court-Proven, Solution-Focused Answers to 7 of the Biggest Legal Challenges facing Experienced Practitioners: Directly from Top-Flight King’s Counsel

Judicial Review 2024

  • Live attendance at The Caledonian Club, London on 13/06/2024. On-demand from 20/06/2024 until 24/10/2024

8 documents available

  1. Consultation - James Maurici KC, Landmark Chambers

    James is "one of the top JR silks at the Bar - bringing a really clear insight into how cases are won and lost." He defended five JRs over the proposed new runway at Heathrow.

  2. Duty of candour - Nicola Braganza KC, Garden Court Chambers

    How have recent cases changed existing thinking on the scope of the duty of candour, including a "staged" duty of candour as asserted in ongoing cases?

  3. Fairness - James McClelland KC, Brick Court Chambers

    What is the latest judicial thinking on procedural and substantive fairness in the post-Gallaher decisions, and what are the implications for the associated intensity of review?

  4. No Substantial Difference - Tom Cross, 11 KBW

    What counts and what will sway the court over time limits and the No Substantial Difference test in light of R (CU) v Secretary of State for Education?

  5. Parliamentary Privilege - Sarah Hannett KC, Matrix Chambers

    How do you balance the competing considerations of parliamentary privilege and judicial review? What are the legal and practical option?

  6. Public Sector Equality Duty - Tim Buley KC, Landmark Chambers

    To what extent does PSED compliance engage civil rights and obligations in the way that substantive discrimination does for Article 6 ECHR, and what is the impact on challenges?

  7. R (CU) v Secretary of State for Education Judgment

    What counts and what will sway the court over time limits and the No Substantial Difference test in light of R (CU) v Secretary of State for Education?

  8. Relief and remedies - Jenni Richards KC, 39 Essex Chambers

    How far can you push the Court on relief and remedies, given the recent reforms to JR, and the ramifications of decisions such as Imam v Croydon (2023) in the Supreme Court?

Search for other documents

  1. Home
  2. Documents
  3. Judicial Review