Judicial Review

Duty to consult (NTS) - Sarah Hannett, Matrix Chambers. How far can you push the boundaries of a public body's duty to consult (adequately), supported by case law and practical examples?

• Date Uploaded: 26 Jun 2020
• Format: PDF
• Size: 200.839 KB

Reasons and fairness (NTS) - Fenella Morris QC, 39 Essex Chambers. Is there a shift in the wind over the general common law duty to give full and comprehensible reasons linked to fairness?

• Date Uploaded: 22 Jun 2020
• Format: PDF
• Size: 118.054 KB

Facts are facts - James McClelland, Brick Court Chambers. Facts are facts, but not all facts are created equal - when is a fact "jurisdictional" and why does it matter?

• Date Uploaded: 22 Jun 2020
• Format: PDF
• Size: 333.953 KB

Disclosure (NTS) - Hugo Keith QC, 3RB. What is realistic and achievable when seeking disclosure in cases concerning public interest immunity and closed material proceedings?

• Date Uploaded: 22 Jun 2020
• Format: PDF
• Size: 185.752 KB

Conspicuous unfairness - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers. How are judges weighing "conspicuous unfairness" as a factor since Gallaher?. Important new innovation or damp squib?

• Date Uploaded: 22 Jun 2020
• Format: PDF
• Size: 512.902 KB

Pre-action in JR - David Wolfe QC, Matrix Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you guide clients through the twists and turns of the pre-action stage, including costs, ADR and candour?

• Date Uploaded: 1 May 2019
• Format: PDF
• Size: 2.076 MB

Disclosure - James McClelland, Fountain Court Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) How do you approach the practical and legal implications of variable standards of disclosure in the Administrative Court: i.e. feast or famine?

• Date Uploaded: 1 May 2019
• Format: PDF
• Size: 841.776 KB

Gallaher decision - Gerry Facenna QC, Monckton Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) In the spotlight of Gallaher, how are you to steer clients through claims for "legitimate expectation" or "conspicuous unfairness"? What leeway do you have?

• Date Uploaded: 1 May 2019
• Format: PDF
• Size: 765.244 KB

No substantial difference (notes) - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.2019) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?

• Date Uploaded: 30 Apr 2019
• Format: PDF
• Size: 442.313 KB

No substantial difference - James Maurici QC, Landmark Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 01.05.19) When does the "no substantial difference test" make a difference in JR applications? Does the outcome differ, depending on whether the case is based on EU or UK law?

• Date Uploaded: 30 Apr 2019
• Format: PDF
• Size: 497.689 KB