Judicial Review

Damages and Restitution - Richard Clayton QC, 7 Bedford Row (Judicial Review, London, 05.04.17) When precisely is it possible or appropriate to attach claims for damages or restitution onto public law JR cases?

• Date Uploaded: 5 Apr 2017
• Format: PDF
• Size: 489.477 KB

Public Sector Equality Duty - Sarah Hannett, Matrix Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) The Public Sector Equality Duty: an Overview and Update

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 302.468 KB

Proportionality - James Goudie QC, 11 KBW (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) Is proportionality becoming a part of domestic public law and introducing factors such as suitability or appropriateness, necessity and the balance or imbalance of benefits and disadvantages? How can you argue proportionality in Judicial Review if no HRA right is in play?

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 308.933 KB

Human Rights Act - Paul Bowen QC, Brick Court Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) Are the cases saying that the common law is the first and only port of call for Judicial Review because it achieves the same and has the same underlying principles as the Convention? To what extent are the courts reverting to the common law?

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 315.307 KB

Duty to Consult - Richard Clayton QC, 4-5 Gray's Inn Square (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) Under the duty to consult, what does a decision-maker have to say to consultees about alternative options, with reference to the common law duty of procedural fairness? Do you start from scratch If your consultation is found to be unlawful? Is Moseley being distinguished out of existence?

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 486.301 KB

Candour - Nusrat Zar, Herbert Smith Freehills (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) Tactically, is lack of candour now the preferred line of challenge - overtaking substantive issues in Judicial Review?

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 799.314 KB

Bank Mellat [2014] - Richard Gordon QC, Brick Court Chambers (Judicial Review, London, 03.03.16) How can you judge the difference between the standard of review and the intensity of review, with reference to Lord Sumption's four questions and the margin you give the primary decision-maker?

• Date Uploaded: 23 Aug 2016
• Format: PDF
• Size: 316.19 KB